[[ "At least everyone lived." Except, of course, for the person he'd helped kill. The innocent person he'd helped kill. And there was still no proof that there even were evil spirits possessing the living. It was entirely possible that their hosts were just playing a sick game with their guests, seeing if they would kill each other over nothing.
It was a solid bet that they would.]]
@SparklingEspeon @Waffle What did you do / find the last two nights?
Well... things could have gone worse? Windskull's claim strongly suggests that there is a roleblocker, probably on the scum side. Unless it is the sort of ability that could fail without being blocked? Not entirely sure what sort of form that would take. If scum does have a roleblocker, then a two-mafia team would have the killer / role block. That's not super powerful for starting with an 8-2 disadvantage in a power role heavy game. I'm inclined to think that either mafia have a collective kill and individual roles or that there are three. Which puts us in a much worse position now, 6-3.
I will admit that I was part of a miskill we couldn't afford yesterday. I wanted
some information to go off of, and there was no other way to get it than going after Del. But that does put me further in the sus hole. Not exactly willing to claim rn since it would make my role much less effective.
General thoughts:
Fusion: Two of the three people who voted for the miskill had also been voting for Fusion earlier in the day. That's possibly just coincidence, but it's pushing me to a strong town lean.
Tanuki: In hindsight, they weren't wrong. I'm a bit nervous that 2/3 of the killer trinity are certain they're clear but... I can absolutely understand their reasoning tbh. The awkward claim and sound logic on not daykilling lead me to a strong town lean.
Shiny Phantump: I have no strong thoughts. They didn't contribute a whole lot yesterday, so I guess I'd like to hear more today. A decent-enough candidate for suspicion at this time, but still a neutral read.
Windskull: If Eq's logic is right (tbh I've played one other game in the last ten years, I wouldn't know), they're pretty much cleared by virtue of being roleblocked N1. Very strong town read.
DawningWinds: I've read through all their posts again and they generally seem sincere and helpful. Some lean a little into content without contributing, sure, but nothing abnormal. It's only being part of the kill vote that makes me a little sus and, well, if I had good intentions, it's possible they did as well.
Equitia: If they're mafia we're screwed lol. For better or worse they've been driving the game's flow so far. And I think that their logic is generally sound? Maybe info roles should keep an eye in that direction, but until someone can report strong evidence that they're scum I'm inclined to accept that they're helpful. If only so the game can keep moving.
Persephone: Ah, well, it does objectively look like I'm the scummiest, I suppose. I had my reasons. RNG addiction and thinking in terms of a larger game for my disastrous first post, following more experienced players after that.
I'm gonna cast a vote for
Shiny Phantump for now. Just to get more of their thoughts on everything. If anyone has specific questions for me or things they'd like justified, I can answer them either in the next two hours or in the morning when I wake up.
