[[
So, apparently Jen chose one of the worst times to get a migraine and try to nap it off.
]]
Okay, I want to get this done quickly so my reasoning will all be ooc. By the time of my last post, my biggest candidates for lynching were SparklingAurate and Namo. SparklingAurate because not only have they been inactive, but their post after everything was settled struck me as the most scummy of all the inactives. Namo because of his “divide-the-healer” suggestion that leaves us vulnerable to mafia roleblocking and some misgivings of his Day 1 behavior in light of that.
I’m not for lynching SparklingAurate anymore. Others look way more suspicious.
I… really don’t know what to make of Espeon’s reveal that she only saw DawningWinds on Chibi Pika before they were taken out last night. The swapping makes everything more complicated and afasdfasdf. Other people have talked about it and how Sike and DawningWinds are implicated. If we go that route, I know what I said earlier but I’m more inclined to go for DawningWinds than Sike. Sike just strikes me as less suspicious right now.
Namo. His vague roleclaim didn’t comfort me at all last night. And I have to admit that when he confessed to being an odd-numbered vigilante my first reaction was “well ain’t that convenient”. I don’t know, if that's a thing someone tell me, but it is very convenient. I assumed there was no vigilante when only one person died last night and no one the first, so that roleclaim would be safer than others, and with being a vigilgante that can strike only every other day we couldn't expect Namo to prove himself until N3. I know I was on the no-lynch train Day 1, but if I was vigilante, yes, I’d target someone. By N1 we’d have information about how people were reacting. Namo also talked about how we just might want to lynch Espeon to get her out of the game today, but in Discord Espeon said how she was thinking of dropping out during Night 1. Namo knew that, so why not target her N1 so at least we’d not have to spend a day lynching her? Even if he didn't think of it, why not leave her until N3? He says he's going to play conservatively so he can remove her then if he doesn't have another target. That way, she can keep giving information and we don't have to waste a day.
The only thing that brings me to Namo’s side is that he is being very, very, very suspicious. Very suspicious. But some of this stuff like the divide-the-healer suggestion is small enough that I still feel like they're possible to be purposeful ploys. We only caught onto that when Elyvorg realized it during another disagreement, remember.
I'm not 100% sure, but either way I still think lynching Namo would work out the best for us out of every other candidate for lynching. If he’s guilty, from his “split the healer” suggestion we’d know there’s probably a mafia roleblocker we have to look out for. I also admit to being suspicious of Tanuki’s behavior. If Namo flips guilty, I think we should question him more. If Namo flips innocent, I’m more inclined to think that Tanuki’s okay.
Beyond that, if we mis-lynch, I’d much rather lose an odd-numbered vigilante than a swapper, healer, or info role. We'd also get way more info lynching Namo than picking an inactive.
All that said:
[[
The nap didn’t even get rid of the migraine. And everything that was happening was bringing it back. Jen pressed his palms against his eyes, trying to think.
Charizard announced he was an odd-numbered vigilante. An odd-numbered vigilante. What the hell was that? And really convenient too. Sorry, I can’t target anyone tonight. And tomorrow night: Drat, one of the healers must have protected my target or a swap messed things up. All while he was picking off innocents each night. Yeah, sure. Cool story, bro.
“I vote for Charizard((/Diyem/Namo)).” Jen rubbed his temples. He’d just have to work through this. No more naps. “Question Wobbufet and Finar tomorrow, but he’s way more suspicious.”
]]
Jen’s more certain than I am, but yeah. I’ll be around and able to change my vote if something comes up, but for now that’s what I’m going with.