[[This sort of thing is honestly always pretty vibes-based, and also very prone to confirmation bias. Once you think someone's scum, stuff they do seems scummy even if they did in fact do it perfectly innocently and aren't scum at all; happens every game to everyone. The manner of how you were responding just felt like the sort of thing I'm used to seeing from scum players or even falling into as scum: that's silly because I would never do this as scum, the reasons you're voting for me are completely unreasonable, voting me out is actually voting out an innocent and that's really bad for town so you should all be turning this train around and picking someone else, while you weren't doing anything to contribute to town gamesolving in the process, only talking about why people shouldn't be voting for you. If pressed on it I might have thought back on past games, where I think I've read you as scum while defending yourself for similar reasons before only for you to flip town; possibly I would've recalibrated based on that. But, as I said, I only read this when I was catching up in the morning, and since it was all over by that point, I didn't spend too much thought on it - I just mentioned the vague gut feeling I had reading through it for transparency, because I didn't want to lie and say I totally definitely would've figured it was dead air dead villager and turned the whole thing around if I'd been there.I would genuinely like to know what I could have possibly done in this situation to not be suspect. I tried to be as calm and level-headed about it as possible. I knew I was a lost cause anyway, but the fact that my posts weren’t even acknowledged by anyone but Phan before EOD really freaking sucked, even if it was largely due to timezone BS. Having Aer come right out the gate today to say “btw I read Rui as innocent” as the very next follow up to that kinda set me off a bit, lol.
I don’t know what I could possibly have done or said in my defense that wouldn’t have read as “sus” at this point. I’d like elaboration on how/why my defense read that way to you?
What would've made it read less like that to me would have been if you'd acknowledged why your info being bad would look suspicious, and you must have been drunk or poisoned, and then you'd tried to weigh in with more of your thoughts on the gamestate and what info we could glean from this. But I must also stress that it's not like there's a single approved playstyle and you need to play that exact way to not look like scum. If I'm scumreading you incorrectly based on how you naturally react when suspected, then it's me that's wrong, not you!]]
[[Occam's razor was perhaps not the ideal term to go for. What I meant by it was sure, there could always be role confusion shenanigans, but also your info might just be wrong because you're lying, and that was clearly simpler and more likely than the whole convoluted theory going on at the time where you were drunk or poisoned but also coincidentally Hareta just so happened to be the Spy so he was still evil (remember, I was there pushing back against the Hareta wagon specifically). But in this game, where role confusion shenanigans are much more prominent than in conventional mafia, there's probably a pretty reasonable argument to be made that role confusion shenanigans are technically the simplest explanation for any given individual discrepancy, so when not speaking relative to the Hareta spy theory, it wasn't the best choice of words.Regarding your explanation for the vote: you’ve phrased it well, but the fact remains that, as scum, to make such a specific claim is still a very bold move. Way too many things would have to line up for me to not get caught in a lie there. There were three explanations: I was Drunk, I was Poisoned, or I was scum.
The argument of me being scum just has so many caveats and is a much more complicated assumption than either of the other two options. You called Occam’s Razor, yet went for the most complicated explanation. The simplest and most straightforward explanation was drunk or poisoning—and now that’s been proven right, unless Aer, Phan, and Chibi are all lying, which I don’t think is the case.
I do believe at this point that you were probably just the Drunk. None of the reasons why I voted for you meant you couldn't turn out to be the Drunk! I don't totally trust Spectrier, and there's also a possibility you were poisoned if Spectrier is lying/drunk, and theoetically some galaxy brain something where you and Chibi and aer are scum together, but I'm basically discounting that at this point.
As Chibi also mentioned, you would not actually have needed a bunch of things to line up to avoid being caught in a lie if you'd been scum. You would have been making the claim because Investigator would have been your designated unique fakeclaim, with a guarantee that no real player had it; under all normal circumstances your info wouldn't have been disproven so soundly so quickly; and even if it had been, you would still always have had the plausible deniability of possibly hvaing been drunk/poisoned. So it would have been a perfectly safe and reasonable scum play. It does sound like you genuinely didn't think it would have been because you're still very adamant about this, which is fair enough especially if you're not scum and thus didn't actually spend much time strategizing about how having a designated fakeclaim would play out in this game! But I assumed if you were scum with a designated fakeclaim, it'd be pretty likely you'd have read the wiki page for your fakeclaim role and seen the strategy suggestions.]]
[[Chiming in with everyone else that you've done fine! Mafia can be overwhelming, especially when you're new to it, but you were actually pretty helpful to town in the end, and now we all believe you're town. No one wants you to leave the game, promise!]]I am frankly amazed I wasn't killed last night... I was not worthy for this game, I shouldn't have signed up in the first place! But instead I entered and became a deadly liability... My questions at the start and that fake claim directed suspicion at me, which ended up transpiring events that lead to the death of two players... I'm happy some actual progress seems to be made, with the claim of that Mimikyu being the demon, but I don't feel comfortable being in here for much longer. I shouldn't even have said anything, but instead I have proven myself a danger to everyone else. Perhaps I can be turned around, but if the situation doesn't improve then I'll HEAVILY consider resigning. Might as well vote one more time though...
"Little confused by this one. If Rui was the Drunk, she had a fake hint that happened to be about the Scarlet Woman, but nothing about that means there's not a real Scarlet Woman role in the game. Even if Rui'd been a real Investigator, her hint could've been about the Poisoner or Spy instead. Nothing to do with the Scarlet Woman specifically."Actually, looking at this now, are we *sure* there are no duplicate roles in this game? Kinda crazy that we can just out the Demon and end the game. Would there be multiple Demons in play? Again bonkers to think the Drunk role would be the one with Scarlet Woman, who would inherit. Is there any way the Scarlet Woman *IS* in play but we just wouldn't get a role to confirm it? There's nothing saying we NEED an Investigator IF a Scarlet Woman is in play. Both can be true: no Investigator AND Scarlet Woman exists...
[[Again, the way scum fakeclaims work here, it would be impossible for your designated fakeclaim to get counterclaimed, because the fakeclaim would be guaranteed unique. I don't blame you being confused on this point if you aren't scum, since it's different from how normal mafia has worked when we've played here, but you would certainly have known it if you were, so hypothetical scum!you would not have worried about counterclaims.]][[Except it’s not? If I were scum, I would have played it safe and kept the cards close to my chest. I would not have risked getting counter-claimed on day one. At most I’d have hinted at a soft claim.
"Elgyem wouldn't have had to be poisoned for Rui to be Drunk. The Drunk is good-aligned, so the Empath would've detected her as good either way, no poisoning needed."Aer claims Empath. (N0: Rui/Hareta both innocent; N1: Madeline/Hareta (1)) I've been pingponging like crazy ever since. Was Rui poisoned by sheer luck and Aer correct? Aer poisoned and Rui drunk? In both these scenarios we have to be careful to fully trust Aer. I'm leaning town because the logic seems to add up for me. But I don't know I trust info. We know for a fact There's a drunk. There's too much conflicting intel and the only gurantee we really have is probably Wind (afaik) and Sind.
Let's think about scum!aer for a second. Scum have fake claims so there's a chance as with any town hardclaim that its fake. And it would be both terrifying and powerful to control the game by using empath powers! Also conveniently easy to claim day 2 and essentially pick whoever. Frankly my immediate jump was to sus like perse beause its just so easy of claim imo, much the way I leaned it being easy for Rui to fakeclaim investigator.
"Note Morgan's actual claimed results were, night zero, that the Demon was one of Watt and Madeline, and night one, that the Demon was not either of Rocky and Madeline. She thinks Madeline is the Demon despite her N1 result, because she thinks she was poisoned specifically last night. If you don't think Morgan is Drunk or was poisoned specifically last night, then Morgan's result clears Madeline of being the Demon. I think she was not nearly clear enough about this."Phantumps claims clairvoyant, claims Perse is the demon. Because at first I was entirely skeptical, if scumteam did have that in their fakeclaims, they could have plotted to insinuate anything given they have the priviledged info and would know there's no clairvoyants. they could boldly say almost anything they want. And since there's no role reveal upon death we wouldn't know that they 'picked wrong'. I mean it would be good scumplay to hint a little (after all a scum doesnt fear death) and then claim? . And the whole bit about 'testing' their reads to see if they weren't drunk. I mean add some uncertinty and frinedly testing and bam! townie.
I did end up rereading D0 though and it doesn't feel like scum theatre (but then again good scum theatre doesn't). But I find that under scrutiny, its too bold. I think what makes it feel most plausible is the consistency and the target; I guess I don't see this kind of elaborate thing to come up? It would be ...risky?
The other option is that Phan was poisoned? On the tiny obscure chance Phan was poisoned on either night (instead of Rui, this assumes Rui is Drunk and not flailing minion or Poisoned) its hard to say. If Scum picked up on any hints it would make sense to target a perceived power role like Aer or Phan?
"If Spectrier was poisoned, then that'd mean Morgan wasn't poisoned, which means Madeline is not the Demon. Again, just getting this clear. Morgan's scenario hinges on specifically her having been poisoned specifically last night and not on night zero. Which might be what happened, but please be clear on this when you propose other people were poisoned last night. I'm not really worried about Spectrier getting poisoned last night. He might be evil but poisoning's a long shot. Either way Drunk Rui seems pretty easy to buy."Chibi claims undertaker. Chibi says Rui is innocent. What bugs me here is we don't actually know that this clears Rui if Chibi was poisoned? But obviously only two out of all the results we got were poisoned. If Chibi is poisoned here, it means that at the very least, the Rui bit is bad intel and Phant and Aer are correct, assuming that isn't some S+ tier scum theatre between the two of them (we're ultracooked if we don't have a real a Empath or Clairvoyant what the frick).
But if Chibi did see truthfully this does clear up the whole kerfuffle and explain all the confusion as just genuine confusion not anyone playing anything. Town!Chibi lines up with trying to play it cool day 1 to survive long enough to use a power. But then... scum chibi could just as easily play the same? I mean I think historically scum chibi is very secretive or smth...
"Yet again, just reminding you that if you think Morgan is correct that Madeline is the Demon, then she has to have been poisoned on N1, and not poisoned on N0. And nobody would need to have been poisoned N0 for Rui to be the Drunk."I think Rui was Drunk, and Aer or Phan was poisoned N0 (awful luck bad bad bad) and Phan or Chibi was Poisoned N1 on a lucky guess.
"Because we had info from Rui that either Watt or Hareta was Scarlet Woman, Elgyem's info said Hareta was innocent so it must be Watt, and I also got bad vibes off how Watt was defending himself, like I said when I voted for him. He was weirdly reluctant to claim, and then made a very safe claim when he did, and all in all it had me raising an eyebrow. All the info we had at the time and my gut lined up on that one. Easy choice."Dave, seemingly being confident about Watt yesterday (as opposed to Hareta at the time), only for Watt to turn up Town and Free to be surprised. Why were you more confident about Watt over Hareta before we had the virgin incident?
"He's not hard-confirmed Butler, no. It's an easy fakeclaim."Do we actually know Pano is hard confirmed Butler? I read Pano's roleclaim and explanation but surely that doesn't gurantee that you couldn't make that up if you were scum and got an explanation of how it works, right? I'm not suggesting Pano is guilty I'm just speculating possibilites
"Morgan's powers don't have anything to do with Outsiders. They just state whether one of the two people chosen is the Demon. Morgan thinks she was poisoned last night, and thus that last night's result doesn't mean anything at all. If you don't think she was poisoned, and thus that her info last night meant anything, then Madeline is also not the Demon."[[Yesn’t, but mostly yes? Morgan used Rocky as a control in her experiment to pin down Madeline. Assuming Morgan is telling the truth, then this at least confirms Rocky as an Outsider due to how Morgan’s powers work.]]

