[[Seconding unrepentantAuthor there. This isn't anywhere close to the roughest social deduction game I've been in, not has it been very long. This is just how the genre works. Although the length aspect is unique to the asynchronous forum format.]]
"I get what you're driving at, Rocky, I really do. I'm just... apprehensive about eliminating someone I trust more than someone I don't. And, sure, I can lock in on voting for both, but will everyone else? I have a chance to take out my top suspect here, and I'm worried about giving the horse a chance to seize control of the momentum."
In the extremely likely event that the horse stood up before the town and declared that they'd gotten the poisoner, what would happen? Would people really commit to taking the horse out, or decide that taking out tertiary targets was a better idea? Especially when they would almost certainly going to face the same dilemma again tomorrow: She'd be in the same boat again tomorrow, when they could take out a used-up Slayer instead of an inforole and risk nothing except the game.
Ew. Thinking through her gut feelings like that made it seem like a rancid impulse. She intellectually understood that being town meant trusting your team. She even distantly remembered what it felt like to be an eusocial species, even if she'd been similarly closed-off back then herself.
[[As much as that's Morgan rp framing, I do ooc worry about the fact that this 'would you really eliminate an inforole' dilemma will never clear up, and that I'll die alone on the Chibi hill once uA's dead and almost surely labelled evil, and I have no idea what terrifying and unpredictable flavour of paranoia would set in if Chibi calls a Ravenkeeper flip.]]
"Fine. I... I could get behind it. But— But I want to be able to trust that we're not just going to keep procrastinating on taking the horse out because of the whole being a possible info role dilemma, should the game continue when Mal dies."