Equitial
Ace Trainer
- Pronouns
- he/him
- Partners
-
If it turns out there can just be two protectors... heck. Guess I just put a target on my head, but I’m extremely suspicious of Sike now.
There were two protectors last game so...
If it turns out there can just be two protectors... heck. Guess I just put a target on my head, but I’m extremely suspicious of Sike now.
I already gave my answer to that one, too, more than once--including right in the bit you quoted there, as a matter of fact:
Emphasis on I currently have no evidence either way.
Re: role overlaps - I at least think it's pretty likely there could be two doctors in a game this big; there were in last year's. If there is a second doctor, they should definitely stay quiet for the time being.
[[ “Hoho! My thought as well! As I said, not a serious cause for suspicion at this time, but something I’d like for us to remember occurred, in case it’s useful information. Peculiar behavior indeed.” Lauchs seemed rather vexed by Dave’s ability to manifest beer from nothing despite his own misfortune trying to do so with leeks himself. He gave an annoyed look at the bottle before clearing his throat (sounding rather like he’s quacking) and continuing on."Last, well, the charizard started proposing we kill people yesterday and then got really mad when people turned to him. It just all seems a little odd. Insisting someone should be suspected and then being furious when it comes around to you. And he seems smart so I'd hate to fight him for long if he was evil."
Scenario 1: Sike is lying, Tanuki is telling the truth
If Sike is lying about their protector role and we assume that dawningwinds really is a switcher, it would still be possible for Chibi to have been protected night 0 if they targeted SparklingEspeon and the shield got swapped to them (if I'm understanding game mechanics correctly, if I'm not please correct me). Alternatively, the target was never Espy, and Chibi protected whoever the mafia actually targeted. Unfortunately, this seems to be information that we don't have.
And then night 1, it wouldn't have mattered who Chibi targeted so long as it wasn't qva, again as long as we can trust dawningwinds claim. Which, at this point in time, is the claim I trust the most.
Scenario 2: Tanuki is lying, Sike is telling the truth
To break this one down further...
A. Chibi was a protector, but Tanuki is not backup
If this is the case, It would still have been possible for the mafia to target someone else. Sike protects Espy, Chibi protects someone else, and the mafia could have targeted either of them. That much is true so long as Sike is telling the truth. What's questionable is how Tanuki would have known Chibi was a protector if he's not the backup. The only alternative off the top of my head is if he was a rolecop. I absolutely don't believe this scenario because it feels too outlandish, but it was worth throwing out there to explore the possibility.
B. Chibi was not a protector at all
In this case, the mafia target N0 would absolutely have to be Espy if DW is telling the truth. Which, in this scenario, is pretty much set in stone. Unless there's another protector out there.
That's a fair point. I got a little too focused on trying to work out whether a theoretical protect-swap could have happened, but I agree with what you're saying here, and with the rest of your post in general.Your logic seems a little backwards. In a scenario in which Sike is lying about protecting Espurr on night 0, there's absolutely no reason to believe that Espurr was even the mafia's target that night at all and therefore no need to try and "explain" it.
That was what confused me. We do have evidence that DawningWind did the swap because they confirmed your story before you said you protected Chibi. Elyvorg outlined some reasons how/why they could be lying, but right now that's a point in their favor. Personally, I'm inclined to treat all the people who've claimed so far as innocent unless other information comes up.
"Assuming they are both telling the truth... we need to make sure they aren't aiming for the same person. Perhaps even divide up their target candidates so the mafia cannot predict for sure who will aim for what. One only aims for those whose names start with M or earlier, and the other for the rest..."
Another swig, sans the cough, ‘n’ he turned t’Ntairow. “M’apologies. Wa’n’t right of me to go throwin’ accusations like that. Bit green’n this neck o’ the woods, y’see? Hope I didn’t cause ya too much heartache.”
[[“Oh ain’t you the sweetest in barrel? Why, I’ll bet yer outhouse smells like dandelions’n’ roses’n’ flowers grow where y’pee.” Desper rolled his eyes. “‘Ga’dless, I’gree we’ve gots’nough’nfermation’n’at’r inaction’ain’t gonna fly’ny longer. I believe me’n Scales’ve shared’r beef, so I won’t divulge much more, but we’s at least got’nough info t’know who’s’nnocent.”And it reflects rather well on me if they are, doesn’t it? Oho.
[["What Grovyle said."]]
elyvorg raises a good point but also my understanding is that it isn’t really just about this, it’s also about his weird reaction to when i gave him the lightest of shade.Regardless, Namo didn’t even start the discussion on killing, he just ran with it for a suspicious amount of time. He cited game theory, which leaves me inclined to believe he honestly thought it was the best move. In my experience, Mafia are way quicker to drop the first round execution idea... like the people who actually started the discussion did. I think they should answer for themselves more than Namo should.