Neo's list just doesn't make sense to me. Other than Anubis and Morgan, the other 3 feel like purely placed there off of RP vibes. The two in the mafia list felt like they RPed in a relatively hostile way and I feel no gameplay impact from Kimiko other than RP in a friendly way, and I don't think those are valid reasons to qualify throwing someone into town or scum for a readslist.
[[Hi hi! Allow me to answer this.
I was scrambling at EOD Day 1 to catch up on the thread and offer some reads as well as a vote before it closed. So I didn’t have time to expand on my every reading.
TLDR, anybody who voted to abstain had me place them as soft town. While voting out someone at random D1
is a totally valid way to get info, the lack of caution considering this is a role madness game made me side eye a few people. Historically, role madness games on TR often result in multiple deaths a night, so mislynching on D1 could be
very, very bad for Town.
Which is why I placed gentle suspicion on anybody who advocated against abstaining. Of course mislynching someone would work in their favor if they’re scum! And they can easily cover it up with “we need info!”
That said, I was also wary of anybody saying not to vote for an inactive player, because we’ve had a history of big problems with inactive players in TR games. The argument that inactive players are rarely scum isn’t totally true, either; in my first game, we had multiple inactives and I remember at least one or two who ended up being third party. When I was scum in another game, one of my teammates was voted out for inactivity. Etc.
So on D1, I was convinced that one of the less active players was scum and that they had teammates trying to cover for them
and direct suspicion on a Townie, which is why I was certain at least one or two people on the Morgan vote train were scum.
Given today’s events, my thoughts on the whole defending inactives being sus has shifted a little, because I really did have Free as soft town with the way she was grilling Eon. And the best defense she’s been able to come with is a vanilla townie counterclaim and the condemner argument, neither of which are enough to sway me, and Lyn has found a nice workaround (hopefully) for the condemner issue, even at her own expense.
The only scenario I can think of where Lyn is lying is if they’re TP. But that’s pretty wildly risky for TP, who already has the odds stacked against them, and it makes no sense as scum. So I believe the claim!
[[This feels consistent with Yellow's previous gameplay reads to me. Matthias is listed twice under neutral, but otherwise,
Lololol WHOOPS this is definitely because I was both rushing and flip flopping on my reads even as I was typing. I initially had everyone but Persephone and Lyrical under neutral or soft town, but then I thought about the inactives defense and found that odd given TR’s game history. I probably was overthinking there, tbh, but this is the Game of Overthinking, haha!
Speaking of which, I’m still really not jazzed about
@lyrical ’s utter lack of participation. Can you speak up, please? And give us some of your thoughts? Why did you say we MUST vote for someone on Day 1 with no elaboration?]]