((Argh, screw it, I'm making the post anyway. Sorry everyone. I swear I'll give an opinion on Cabot's post soon.))
Starr stands at the front of the room and takes a deep breath. “Saying it straight out: I don’t have an ironclad guilty read on anyone. My vote is gonna be solely by process-of-elimination, starting from most likely to be innocent and working down. Sometimes, figuring out who to trust is not as important as figuring out who NOT to trust.”
Mel: 100% - I have no suspicions of Mel whatsoever. Mel’s swap action has consistently checked out both before and after day 3. It was her targeting me that led me to realize—as early as day 2—that I wasn’t gonna get converted. Her motivations for voting Dave over Mia yesterday feel thoroughly pro-innocent. She’s consistently tried to get to the bottom of things, and none of her posts have ever tripped a manipulating or distracting flag.
Hecto: 80% - I already mentioned why I don’t think Psyduck would have pointlessly cast suspicion on the recruit when it would serve zero purpose for earning our trust, aka, the number one reason to get your fellow mafia killed. All of Hecto’s earlygame posts check out when combined with his rollclaim. The agenda behind his posts consistently reads as pro-innocent. Even his debate with Cabot doesn’t read as
trying to get an innocent jailed. He arrived at Cabot by process of elimination, and was openly looking to be proven wrong. I’ll be honest, I was running low on people to suspect and found my mind drifting idly toward Cabot as well (at least, until Cabot spoke up). It doesn’t seem malicious to me. ((NOTE: this needs to be updated for Cabot’s latest post.))
Cabot: 75% - Look, I admit that going into today, I had a weak read on Cabot. The fact that he was acting mostly alone, without his author, made things difficult. I think he reacted a bit excessively to Hecto’s vote, given that Hecto was just at a loss to who was suspicious and had nowhere else to turn. But I’m not reading malice. Everything about his posts reads as someone genuinely trying to find inconsistencies in what Hecto said. ((NOTE: this needs to be updated for Cabot’s latest post.))
Loki: 70% - For them to be mafia, we have to assume that (1) they’re not the recruit, so (2) they have some kind of nonlethal mafia power, and (3) that they’re allowed to both kill and use that power in the same night, possibly due to being the last one standing. Also either Hecto is naive cop or Loki
also gets godfather on top of everything else. That’s just a humongous pile of unlikely circumstances. They’re not trustworthy, but I’m just having a hard time figuring out how they even
could be mafia.
Lachlan: 60% - At the start of the day, I felt mostly okay about Lachlan. The fighting between Mia and Lachlan doesn't read as scum vs scum at all. And the fight kept the exact same tone across day 2 and 3, so I wasn’t chalking that up to any recruit business. And it would be pretty stupid for the mafia to initiate such heavy suspicion at their recruit, aka, their trump card. Lachlan’s posts were instrumental to me realizing Mia was mafia. Lachlan suspecting Loki after both Hecto and I had given Loki a weak clear doesn’t read as scum jumping on an opportunistic lynch at all. And claiming a protective role at that point was very much not the path of least resistance--another point against it being scum-motivated.
But also there are some things that make me leery of Lachlan. He’s still fixated on Loki, despite most of us agreeing that Loki being mafia doesn’t make any sense. But he hasn’t brought up arguments to the contrary either. I also wanted his input on whether Mia seemed like the recruit or not, and he didn’t say anything, even though I would think that was very relevant to his situation. And his last few posts have felt weirdly distracting; while the rest of us are scrambling to unravel this web of confusion, it’s almost like he doesn’t care.
It’s not nearly enough for me to feel comfortable making a case against him right now. But it still makes me wary. If both he and I are still around tomorrow, I will be scrutinizing him closely.
Dave: ??% - I’ve been having a very, very difficult time getting a read on Dave. Either innocent or guilty. Sure, there have been
situations surrounding Dave that seemed to point toward either innocence or guilt (at the time). But his tone, his intent, his interactions, his
agenda. All the messy, subjective stuff. I can’t read it. His redirects have consistently managed to not interact with Mel’s swap in any meaningful way, making them hard to verify (assuming they even worked), and the only time I got a watch on him was with Karo. I chalked that up to Mia being the silent killer, but Hecto’s investigation cast doubt on that.
And… something there’s something else bothering me. When I started closing in on Mia, she made no real attempt at all to point us at anyone else. Did you notice that? The only thing that could’ve saved her at that point was convincing us to jail someone else. And the only
remotely feasible target was Dave. But she didn’t even try. She could’ve tried to screw him over to look good in our eyes. But I think she was already too fargone at that point. Bussing him wouldn’t have helped because she was more suspicious than him. But… if she instead just took the fall in order to make sure that he’d fly under the radar… he already had a pretty good alibi. Hell, we just straight up forgot about the Karo thing for most of the day.”
“I didn’t
want to believe Dave is lying because that would’ve required some kinda god-tier prediction on his part to make everything line up perfectly. And making up the 50% redirect thing is like… why the hell make up such a weird-ass lie? But what if it’s not a lie? What if that really is his power. Mafia Redirectors exist. It’d be pretty damn easy to tell a story that was
mostly truthful, but tweaking one or two details. And it would automatically be supported by everything he’d said or done up ‘til this point.”
“This is the point where I’d
like to make a bigass case for why Dave is guilty. But I can’t do that. I don’t have a read on him. This is just process of elimination. I’m not voting for Mel, Hecto, Cabot, or Loki, period. Lachlan’s situation is weird, but not enough for me to feel comfortable voting for him (yet). Dave is the only one left. The only way he’s innocent is if Hecto is a naive cop (or if Loki is a ninja+godfather+other), and even then, that just shifts the goalposts toward him being the recruit instead of OG mafia, (which would honestly explain why I can’t get a read on him).”
“But if process of elimination isn’t enough, then let’s run risk/reward on if I’m wrong:
- If we jail Loki and we’re wrong, we lose a protector.
- If we jail Lachlan and we’re wrong, we lose a protector.
- If we jail Dave and we’re wrong, we lose a 50% redirector.
“This is the least risky option to me. I sure as hell don’t feel good about it. This isn’t like Psyduck or Mia. I was 100% damn sure they were mafia. I’m
not sure about Dave. I might be wrong. But it’s all I got.”
((And this was where I was GOING TO vote for Dave, but asdf I need to examine Cabot’s post aaaaaaaaa.))