Search results

oh i thought that vote was a joke

two shots in the night plus a pgo feels like a lot. i guess if three people die then we can start moving some puzzle pieces around but if you let fear of that prevent you from using your power then you're pretty much throwing your role away i think.

yeah, this makes sense to me. it seems sort of redundant to have a separate buddy win condition when your normal win condition is sure to be the same as your buddy's anyway. i don't think jackie's theory actually encourages this, but i do agree with your sentiment here. i don't think it's...

the distinction between these two things seems irrelevant to me. the sentiment boils down to "it's not reasonable for you to make assumptions about the game," and if that's true then it's completely impossible to speculate or solve. framing the game in that way has a lot more utility for mafia...

i think it’s fine to keep an open mind and we should all be doing that, but i don’t think shutting down speculation because “the setup is wacky and it could be anything” is really that—in fact i’d say it’s the opposite, and casting shade on people for making fairly reasonable assumptions about...

i’m not sure i’m understanding how it’s :/. what’s the scenario you’re envisioning where third party is not anti-town?

you want to make light and have a good time with your friends.

meh. i think that’s kind of an uncharitable read. third party is generally anti-town and have win conditions that are incompatible with ours. it’s in the interest of town as a faction to eliminate them. i don’t think it’s weird to describe that as scum, unless you’re interpreting “scum” to...

to me null means no real thoughts. i use it to describe people whose play has been unremarkable and hasn’t really pinged on my radar. that’s not true of you, but i’m not walking away from your posting with a read, either. it could have come from either direction. so no real lean, but not really...

ok i’m done thinking the dw thing is hilarious and will come clean now for full transparency: i was being facetious when pretending to TR them and have not really moved off null for them still. or i guess i’m more ambivalent now than null but it boils down to meh

well, you must understand that i was a different person in those days. back then, i was consumed by the systematic analysis of posts. was this sentence wolfy wifom spew scumtell? or was it omgus towny derpclear? this gradual, methodical accretion of ten thousand micoreads to construct an...

well this sucks but forever is forever so sadly i am forced to concur with you.

agreeing with all this, i was thinking it before but struggled to articulate it dw locktown forever now

following most of this but unsure why they would be motivated to slow the game down/hunt for other-scum explicitly over just firing away as usual. does it not benefit both sides of scum to kill as much of the game as possible as quickly as possible? i feel like scum is more likely to be sussed...

perhaps not, if their wincon is just to outnumber everyone else

its too early to solve cease posting immediately and lets get some memes going in da chat

unless...? 😳

oh fuck!!!!

ok guys, let's just kill no one for tonight in order to throw em off. see you in the morning.

"Eccaulte! Þe tyme for snæckening biþ upon we alle! Ic schall, ein Haught-Dogge saussicche, twiccst yonder Bunne, hauen!" <Exalt! The time for snacking is upon us all! I shall have a hot-dog sausage, twixt yonder bun!>