-- Conversation initiated with WitchesBlue [FORTUNATA, FIAMETTA] --
[WB] wait hold on
[WB] i must have missed something
[WB] am i understandin right
[WB] do lovers win if theyre the only two left regardless of everyone else
[WB] that would change
[WB] like
[WB] everything about what i said
i don’t think this is necessarily the case. it depends on the way the host decides to implement it, but i think most of the time the lovers win under the regular win conditions for their alignment. sometimes there’s third party shenanigans with them in which one lover is scum and the other isn’t, but tbh i don’t see that being the case here for the time being.
-- Conversation initiated with WitchesBlue [FORTUNATA, FIAMETTA] --
[WB] im not tryin to say youre a lover at all
[WB] i thought desper ado was sayin that the professor was a lover
[WB] and that she was votin for herself because of it
[WB] if both lovers are town great
[WB] i was sayin that the only reason a lover would vote for themself is if they were mafia
[WB] and tryin to lure the town into killin them
[WB] and thus killin a townsfolk
[WB] which i dont think would actually happeni think (?) what desper is saying is that i might be a lover, and that the mafia might know as much, which is why they attempted to target me; and alternately that dw might be a lover, so they’re fine with taking the L because it kills a townie too. he’ll want to verify but that was my impression.
-- Conversation initiated with WitchesBlue [FORTUNATA, FIAMETTA] --
[WB] right that second one is what im gettin at
[WB] im tryin to say that as a strategy for the mafia it doesnt make sense to just up and vote for yourself from the get go
[WB] even if it does get rid of a townsfolk
[WB] like yall beat that one into my head earlier
[WB] like sure
[WB] if the mafia lover gets eliminated
[WB] its not as bad for the mafia since theyll take a townsfolk with them
[WB] but it doesnt make sense for that to be their guiding strategy
[WB] the point that im tryin to make
[WB] is that on the surface level it might sound plausible
[WB] and that its another thing that has me side eyein desper ado
[[“M’apologies, meant it nothin’ like ‘n accusation,” Desper said. “Merely ponerin’ why you’d’a been shot at night one.” He glanced at the buzzin’ screen’n’ mumbled, “What’s’ghetti gots t’do with anythin’ I’m sayin?”
[[ Lauchs nodded. “No harm, no foul for this fowl,” he said with a smile. “But I don’t think the lovers should proclaim their affair publicly, for what that’s worth. Gods know how the wicked ones might exploit such a pure and tender passion...” ]]
[[Desper nodded. “You just hit the stake with a hoss shoe.”
[[Desper picked up the device, readin’ it o’er a few times. “Well, I ain’t sayin’ ‘t’s what they wanted t’happen, but it’d ‘splain the goin’s on of the now, I reckon.”
...It was Sike who claimed on accident and Sike who wasn't where they said they were? NonAnalogue hasn't claimed at all?
What? Yeah, that’s what I’m saying. “One bird to another” was literally from one bird to another bird, lol.
Kwazai are birds?
Someone called Ntairow a big blue bird I am certain of it
That doesn't sound like a bird to me??
I can't spell.
